One of the most frequently asked questions we have to field, is how idio differs from the other digital magazine providers. Since there are fundamental differences in our approach and process, I thought I would write a quick post explaining the differences.

The digital magazine providers (such as Ceros, Texterity, Zmags, Nxtbooks, Mymagz, Zinio etc etc etc) at their core provide a simple PDF-to-”flash page-turn magazine” format conversion. So the publisher uploads pdf’s into the content management system, and the system outputs a magazine format – allowing the publisher to add links and sometimes interactive elements as well. As standard, these services provide good tracking, and subscription payment walls.

This service is fine for a publisher who has an archive of print magazines and wants to digitise them cost-effectively – opening them up to a wider audience online. However it is likely that these services are really an interim solution (between print and online) as they don’t make the most of the advantages of the web, and still have most of the costs of print publishing. And the most important issue in these economic times, is that for all their cost-cutting, the standard page-flip magazines do not create any (or much) additional revenue).

Readability:
Only a certain proportion of the online audience wants to read online sources in a magazine format – as it can be very restrictive (and the digital magazine providers force the reader into a linear reading experience, rather than a hierarchical/link-based one which is more normal on the web). One key difference between print and digital publishing, is that when on the web, presentation is abstracted from content (whereas in print, presentation is fundamental to the content). In other words: online, even if you publish in a pleasing format, users still want to consume the information as they please – ie they will view it from mobile, or via RSS, or place it in a widget for their iGoogle, or with old browsers/operating systems etc. idio therefore is able to deliver via multiple channels simultaneously – magazine, website, mobile, widget, desktop download. And the process of formatting and presenting the content is done automatically based on how the user wants to receive it.

Production:
With the standard digital magazine providers, the publisher still has to design and layout every page spread (a cost which is acceptable in print publishing, but is hard to carry online only). With idio, the page spreads are created and designed automatically from the source text and media. External links and relevant article links are also selected automatically.

Personalization:
idio also adds the personalized element, which no other digital magazine providers do. We select the best content for the reader based on their tastes. This increases the value to the reader, and improves enagagement and retention. The magazine can be customized by the user or publisher to improve the value to each individual.

Dynamic vs Static:
All the above points stem from a fundamental difference in architecture. idio is dynamic – all the content, presentation, formatting is done by the system, and can be edited, added or removed instantly and regularly. With the digital magazine providers, the user is generally viewing an edited pdf – a static page. This dynamic structure has a huge number of benefits – not least that idio can be completely feed-driven: once it has been told which content feeds to ingest, it can run automatically – learning about user taste and improving its content selection based on their usage, delivering high-engagement advertising based on taste, demographics, and geographics, and being fully embedded within the major social networks.

Revenue:
Since idio can choose advertising based on the user, and insert it on the fly through engaging formats, the advertising can be sold in online terms (CPM, CPC etc) and capitalize on the best campaigns available at the time of reading, therefore the content generates money every time someone views it. The amount of brands who are willing to buy digital ad inventory on print terms is declining from a its already low base. idio solves this. And achieves very high advertising rates and engagement.

Hope that helps. I am aware that some of the other providers are starting to become slightly more “dynamic” in their process, but this still is the fundamental difference between idio and the standard providers. Do shoot me an email or comment with any questions or thoughts.

Tags:

11 Responses to “A comparison of digital magazine providers”

  1. Marcus says:

    Hi Andrew,

    As you know, I’m a big fan of idio and think it’s a great solution for a certain type of customer.

    However, this line, “the standard page-flip magazines do not create any (or much) additional revenue).”… is an incredibly broad-based generalization and serves only as disinformation to an audience trying to understand the various mediums.

    Here’s a recent article from FOLIO quoting real publishers with real results: http://tinyurl.com/cyrukv

    Are most publishers making gobs of money with digital magazines? Of course not – but many are starting to. I’ve yet to see any successful revenue stories on your platform and if they do exist, then share them so the industry as a whole can benefit.

    But at the very least, don’t make the mistake of failing to acknowledge that the conventional digital magazine product has generated readership and revenue for many publishers. It’s all well and good for you to say it isn’t the future, but the same publishers we’re committed to serving have readers and advertisers they need to satisfy now, and for them, the product works.

    Understand, too, I’m saying this as a FAN of idio. Depending on a publisher’s audience, goals and existing content structure, I’d even refer them to you. But don’t be blind to the fact that there are certain publishers better equipped for our solution for the same reasons.

    Marcus

  2. andrew says:

    Thanks for the comment Marcus – fair points.

    My fear is that whilst people are focused on extracting the last bit of value from the old processes “now”, newspapers and magazines are going out of business because they don’t have a strategy that allows for the new business reality – including socially-integrated content creation and selection, a multi-channel distribution plan, a premium advertising offering, etc etc.

    I look forward to the referrals :)

  3. Jonathan says:

    Hi Andrew,

    This is a helpful post. SEO is vital in driving traffic – is this something the Idio platform is strong on to? Or is it just a pure aggregator?

    Thanks
    Jonathan

  4. Andrew says:

    Jonathan – yes its very effective from an SEO standpoint. If you drop me an email, I’d be more than happy to show you some stats.

  5. [...] web version here or the iPhone version here. From what I understand, Texterity and several of the other digital magazine providers have big plans for a paid-content Appstore delivery system for magazines. I only hope that it [...]

  6. [...] we have noted previously, there are several issues with the basic page-turn replicas of magazines, and it seems these proved [...]

  7. KP Allen says:

    Wow, no one is talking about the iPAD….is this the elephant in the room?

    I am looking for a platform that will transform an already popular blog in typepad, with the advertising, marketing, and analytic bells and whistles etc, but, I am missing 8 million viewers…here in our market if our magazine can’t be seen on an iphone, or ipad….anyone got some thoughts as to where you’ll be going with that? As to the page turning thing, its fine for our luxury crowd to get one of these as a special marketing insert, but our content is designed to inform people on the streets of Paris, where to eat, where to go, etc. any thoughts?

  8. Lupe Kinkle says:

    This is such a great post you have shared. I really like reading post like this because its informative and helpful by many person like me. I know its not that easy to make a great post but once you’ve get use to it, you’ll be able to make it easier and more qualified. I’m noting it for future reference. I wish to read more of your post soon. Please add me in your list, so that I will be inform of your new post.

    Just in case your not earning money with your weblog, there’s a good ebook you must have to know how to maximize your earning potential through blogging. I can notice your blog needs a little improvement, I highly recommend that you take time on reading Darren’s book, its full of secret facts of how you can earn more money out of a blog. I recommend that you visit this site called ez-dollar-income (you can find it on google – its top in the search engine) – a friend shared it to me and indeed had help me a lot on making money on my weblog. Be sure to subscribe so that you’ll be notified for new blog money chances. I now made 30-50$ each day, its not that enough but will soon make more.

    Have a great day and hope to see more post when I come back.

  9. Get latest digital magazines for iPad, iPhone and PC/MAC available on Other Edition newsstand.

  10. Hmm it appears like your blog ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to the whole thing. Do you have any tips and hints for newbie blog writers? I’d definitely appreciate it.

  11. Thang says:

    Andrew, If Im publishing a eMagazine at Vietnam, we always get trouble when covert it to Vietnam font. So, your platform could solve this problem?

Leave a Reply